Summary Graphic of Investigative Report Published by ProPublica and The Chronicle of Higher Ed.

June 1, 2023
Helpful Resources, News, Publishing as high school students
Summary Graphic of Investigative Report Published by ProPublica and The Chronicle of Higher Ed

ProPublica, a renowned investigative journalism outlet, recently published an in-depth report exposing the emerging trend of paying for “peer-reviewed” authorship to bolster college admissions prospects. Read the full article here: The Newest College Admissions Ploy: Paying to Make Your Teen a “Peer-Reviewed” Author.

The article delves into the practices of online research programs catering to high school students and sheds light on their questionable methods. 

By examining various providers, including Scholar Launch, Polygence, Lumiere Education, and Athena Education, this report serves as an enlightening guide for high school students, encouraging them to refocus on genuine interests and authentic competitiveness.

We have added a summary of the article:

The Newest College Admissions Ploy: Paying to Make Your Teen a “Peer-Reviewed” Author

ProPublica’s recent investigation report revealed the trend of paying to make teens “peer-reviewed” authors. The report examined over 20 providers of online research opportunities, highlighting questionable practices in this emerging industry. Below is a visual summary of the article’s key points.

Industry-wide issues, as cited in articlesArticle quotes about Pioneer Academics
  • Industry-wide, programs push for publication for high school students as a college application booster. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “A new industry is extracting fees from well-heeled fomilies to enable their teenage children to conduct and publish research that colleges may regard as a credential.”
  • The new research service companies manipulate the concept of ‘preprint’ to make money by forging credentials for college applicants. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “Preprint platforms don’t even bother with peer review.”

    “The usual justification for preprints is that they quickly disseminate vital research, such as new information about vaccines ar medical treatments. High school projects are rarely so urgent. Stiil,…”

“Pioneer ‘never promises academic journal publication,’ according to its website.”

“The push for publication leads young scholars astray. The message is that looking like a champion is more important than training to be a great athlete.”

–Matthew Jaskol, co-founder of Pioneer Academics

  • Industry-wide, there are no standards or rules on how the research should be offered by the providers; as a result, consumers are vulnerable to exaggerated sales pitches. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “Then there’s the question of credentials.” “Company’s website has routinely identified mentors as Ph.Ds even when they don’t have a doctorate”

    “The research services brag about how many of their alumni get into premier U.S. universities.”

  • Publications that research companies push can be dubious or “pay-to-publish”. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “Online services typically shape the topic, direction and duration of the project, and urge students to complete and publish a paper regardless of how fruitful the exploration has been. ‘Publication specialists’ then help steer the papers into a dizzying array of online journals and preprint platforms. Almost any high school paper con find an outlet.”

“The oldest online research mentorship program for high schoolers, Pioneer Academics, founded in 2012, has maintained relatively rigorous standards.”
  • Industry wide, the quality of papers, projects, or publications is questionable. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “In some instances, the mentors seem to function as something more than advisers.”

    “The research service company complained that several students who wanted to cite publications in their college applications hadn’t heard back… The papers were eventually published.”

    “Since high schoolers generally don’t arrive with a research topic, the mentor helps them choose it, and then may pitch in with writing, editing and scientific analysis.”

“Oberlin College gives credits to students for passing Pioneer courses. The college’s annual reviews have found that research done for Pioneer ‘far exceeded’ what would be expected to earn credit, said Michael Parkin, an associate dean of arts and sciences at Oberlin and a former Pioneer mentor, who oversees the collaboration.”
  • Research companies formed intimate ties with consulting businesses for referrals. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “… one of the largest online high school research programs in the U.S., cultivates college counselors.” “Such perks appear to brush up against ethics codes of two college counseling associations…”

  • As a college admissions trend, adding research to the application resume for affluent students has become commonplace. (Note: not at Pioneer Academics)

    “it’s becoming a little more commonplace. I can see it becoming completely over-inundated in the next few years.

“The oldest online research mentorship program for high schoolers, Pioneer Academics, founded in 2012, has maintained relatively rigorous standards. It accepted 37% of its 4,765 applicants last year, and 13% of its students received full scholarships based on need.”

The depth of this investigative article is revealed through the real students’ experiences. The best way of getting both the depth and width of this article is to take the time to read it in its entirety.

Related News

Online Info Session

Doing research is commonplace.
How do you choose the research opportunity that makes a difference?

Join us for a free online info session to learn about Pioneer

At Pioneer Co-Curricular Summit

Check exclusive sharings
From directors of prestigious programs

  • Questbridge
  • Rise
  • Oberlin Colllege & Conservatory
  • Northwestern Center for Talent Development
  • Davidson Institute
  • Johns Hopkins University